Inconstitucionalidad de la responsabilidad penal por presentar información inexacta en ucrania: análisis legales críticos
| Autor | Andrii Vozniuk/Dmitriy Kamensky/Olexandr Dudorov/Roman Movchan/Andriy Andrushko |
| Cargo | Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of Research Laboratory at the National Academy of Internal Affairs/Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of Legal Courses Department at Berdyansk State Pedagogical University/Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of Research Laboratory at Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko/Doctor of Legal ... |
| Páginas | 133-145 |
Recibido el 22/03/2021 Aceptado el 15/06/2021
ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas
La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca ción aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to
de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co “Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che” (IEPDP) de la Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas de la Uni ver si dad del Zu lia.
En tre sus ob je ti vos fi gu ran: co n tri buir con el pro gre so cien tí fi co de las Cien cias
Hu ma nas y So cia les, a tra vés de la di vul ga ción de los re sul ta dos lo gra dos por sus in ves-
ti ga do res; es ti mu lar la in ves ti ga ción en es tas áreas del sa ber; y pro pi ciar l a pre sen ta-
ción, dis cu sión y con fron ta ción de las ideas y avan ces cien tí fi cos con com pro mi so so cial.
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas apa re ce dos ve ce s al año y pu bli ca tra ba jos ori gi na les con
avan ces o re sul ta dos de in ves ti ga ción en las áreas de Cien cia Po lí ti ca y De re cho Pú bli-
co, los cua les son so me ti dos a la con si de ra ción de ár bi tros ca li fi ca dos.
ESTA PU BLI CA CIÓN APA RE CE RE SE ÑA DA, EN TRE OTROS ÍN DI CES, EN
:
Re vicyhLUZ, In te r na tio nal Po li ti cal Scien ce Abs tracts, Re vis ta In ter ame ri ca na de
Bi blio gra fía, en el Cen tro La ti no ame ri ca no para el De sa rrol lo (CLAD), en Bi blio-
gra fía So cio Ec o nó mi ca de Ve ne zue l a de RE DIN SE, In ter na tio nal Bi blio gra phy of
Po li ti cal Scien ce, Re venc yt, His pa nic Ame ri can Pe rio di cals In dex/HAPI), Ul ri ch’s
Pe rio di cals Di r ec tory, EBS CO. Se en cuen tra acre di ta da al Re gis tro de Pu bli ca cio-
nes Cien tí fi cas y Tec no ló gi cas Ve ne zo la nas del FO NA CIT, La tin dex.
Di rec to ra
L
OIRALITH
M. C
HIRINOS
P
ORTILLO
Co mi té Edi tor
Eduviges Morales Villalobos
Fabiola Tavares Duarte
Ma ría Eu ge nia Soto Hernández
Nila Leal González
Carmen Pérez Baralt
Co mi té Ase sor
Pedro Bracho Grand
J. M. Del ga do Ocan do
José Ce rra da
Ri car do Com bel las
An gel Lom bar di
Die ter Nohlen
Al fre do Ra mos Ji mé nez
Go ran Ther born
Frie drich Welsch
Asis ten tes Ad mi nis tra ti vos
Joan López Urdaneta y Nil da Ma rín
Re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas. Av. Gua ji ra. U ni ver si dad del Zu lia. Nú cleo Hu ma nís ti co. Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas. Ins ti tu t o de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli c o
“Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che”. Ma ra cai bo, Ve ne zue la. E- mail: cues tio nes po li ti cas@gmail.
com ~ loi chi ri nos por til lo@gmail.com. Te le fax: 58- 0261- 4127018.
Vol. 39, Nº 69 (Julio - Diciembre) 2021, 133-145
IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ
Unconstitutionality of criminal liability
for ling inaccurate information in
Ukraine: сritical legal analyses
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3969.07
Andrii Vozniuk *
Dmitriy Kamensky **
Olexandr Dudorov ***
Roman Movchan ****
Andriy Andrushko *****
Abstract
The investigation reveals shortcomings in the arguments of
the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the recognition of article
366-1 of the Criminal Code as not being in conformity with the
Constitution, in terms of:(a) the court’s lack of authority to
criminalize socially dangerous acts; (b) lack of argumentation on
the absence of social harm in the non-submission of a declaration
and in the presentation of inaccurate information; (c) positive foreign
experience; (d) conformity of article 366-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
with the principle of the rule of law. The article employs a set of legal
research methods, including terminological, systemic-structural, formal-
logical, and comparative-legal. It is stressed that:(a) the criminalization of
a socially harmful act is a matter for the legislator, not the Constitutional
Court of Ukraine, to decide; (b) the decision does not present or refute
any argument on the element of social harmfulness relating to the non-
submission of a declaration and the declaration of inaccurate information.
On the basis of the investigation, it has been concluded that the decision of
the Constitutional Court on the recognition of article 366-1 of the Criminal
Code does not comply with the Constitution and has not been suciently
substantiated.
* Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of Research Laboratory at the National Academy of Internal Aairs.
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-5626. Email: vaa.999999@gmail.com
** Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of Legal Courses Department at Berdyansk State Pedagogical University.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3610-2514. Email: dm.kamensky@gmail.com
*** Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of Research Laboratory at Luhansk State University of Internal
Aairs named after E.O. Didorenko. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-0681. Email:
o.o.dudorov@gmail.com
**** Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Constitutional, International
and Criminal law at Donetsk National University named after Vasyl Stus. ORCID ID: https://orcid.
org/0000-0003-2074-8895. Email: romanmov1984@gmail.com
5 ***** PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Process at Uzhhorod National
University. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-7898. Email: andrushko525@gmail.com
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba