El uso de la prueba electrónica en los tribunales: un análisis jurídico comparativo en la práctica internacional

AutorAsgarova Matanat Pasha, Aliyev Bakhtiyar Abdurakhman Oglu, Fardin Y. Khalilov, Hasanova Ilhama Zakir Kizi
CargoAssociate Professor Ph.D.in Jurisprudence the Academy of Justice of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan/Doctoral student Doctor of Philosophy in Law/PhD in law The Justice Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan Chief Researcher of the Department of Scientific Research and Doctoral Studies/Head Member...
Páginas385-394
Recibido el 22/09/2021 Aceptado el 06/12/2021
ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas
La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca ción aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to
de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co “Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che” (IEPDP) de la Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas de la Uni ver si dad del Zu lia.
En tre sus ob je ti vos fi gu ran: co n tri buir con el pro gre so cien tí fi co de las Cien cias
Hu ma nas y So cia les, a tra vés de la di vul ga ción de los re sul ta dos lo gra dos por sus in ves-
ti ga do res; es ti mu lar la in ves ti ga ción en es tas áreas del sa ber; y pro pi ciar l a pre sen ta-
ción, dis cu sión y con fron ta ción de las ideas y avan ces cien tí fi cos con com pro mi so so cial.
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas apa re ce dos ve ce s al año y pu bli ca tra ba jos ori gi na les con
avan ces o re sul ta dos de in ves ti ga ción en las áreas de Cien cia Po lí ti ca y De re cho Pú bli-
co, los cua les son so me ti dos a la con si de ra ción de ár bi tros ca li fi ca dos.
ESTA PU BLI CA CIÓN APA RE CE RE SE ÑA DA, EN TRE OTROS ÍN DI CES, EN
:
Re vicyhLUZ, In te r na tio nal Po li ti cal Scien ce Abs tracts, Re vis ta In ter ame ri ca na de
Bi blio gra fía, en el Cen tro La ti no ame ri ca no para el De sa rrol lo (CLAD), en Bi blio-
gra fía So cio Ec o nó mi ca de Ve ne zue l a de RE DIN SE, In ter na tio nal Bi blio gra phy of
Po li ti cal Scien ce, Re venc yt, His pa nic Ame ri can Pe rio di cals In dex/HAPI), Ul ri ch’s
Pe rio di cals Di r ec tory, EBS CO. Se en cuen tra acre di ta da al Re gis tro de Pu bli ca cio-
nes Cien tí fi cas y Tec no ló gi cas Ve ne zo la nas del FO NA CIT, La tin dex.
Di rec to ra
L
OIRALITH
M. C
HIRINOS
P
ORTILLO
Co mi té Edi tor
Eduviges Morales Villalobos
Fabiola Tavares Duarte
Ma ría Eu ge nia Soto Hernández
Nila Leal González
Carmen Pérez Baralt
Co mi té Ase sor
Pedro Bracho Grand
J. M. Del ga do Ocan do
José Ce rra da
Ri car do Com bel las
An gel Lom bar di
Die ter Nohlen
Al fre do Ra mos Ji mé nez
Go ran Ther born
Frie drich Welsch
Asis ten tes Ad mi nis tra ti vos
Joan López Urdaneta y Nil da Ma rín
Re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas. Av. Gua ji ra. U ni ver si dad del Zu lia. Nú cleo Hu ma nís ti co. Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas. Ins ti tu t o de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli c o
“Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che”. Ma ra cai bo, Ve ne zue la. E- mail: cues tio nes po li ti cas@gmail.
com ~ loi chi ri nos por til lo@gmail.com. Te le fax: 58- 0261- 4127018.
Vol. 40, Nº 72 (2022), 385-394
IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ
The use of electronic evidence in court:
a comparative legal analysis
in the world practice
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4072.21
Asgarova Matanat Pasha *
Aliyev Bakhtiyar Abdurakhman Oglu **
Fardin Y. Khalilov ***
Hasanova Ilhama Zakir kizi ****
Abstract
The article is devoted to such a topical issue as the use of
electronic evidence in court. The purpose of the article is to
determine the basic principles of electronic evidence, study
domestic and foreign legislation on the use of electronic evidence
in court, determine their place in the system of evidence, and
identify problems with evidence in court. It was found that
electronic evidence should be understood as factual data that are
displayed in digital forms and recorded on any type of media, as well as after
processing by electronic computers become possible and accessible to human
perception. It has been established that in most of the European countries
we study, electronic evidence is unquestionably classied as written and is
not singled out. It has been identied that electronic documents have the
same legal force in some countries as paper documents. It was concluded
that in Azerbaijan the procedure for collecting and examining electronic
evidence in domestic proceedings should be improved to avoid various
technical errors, as well as to strengthen cybersecurity measures and
increase basic knowledge of judges in the eld of information technology.
Keywords: electronic testing; electronic document; factual data
authenticity of proof; digital justice.
* Associate Professor Ph.D.in Jurisprudence the Academy of Justice of the Ministry of Justice of the
Republic of Azerbaijan H. Zardabi 192, apartment 103, Baku, AZ1011. ORCID ID: https://orcid.
org/0000-0003-1419-9519
** Doctoral student Doctor of Philosophy in Law, Docent the Center for Forensic Expertise Ministry
of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan AZ1044 Republic of Azerbaijan, Baku city, Khazar district,
Mardakan settlement, Sergey Yesenin Street. House 92/2, apt.18. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-
0003-0104-4921
*** PhD in law The Justice Academy of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Azerbaijan Chief
Researcher of the Department of Scientic Research and Doctoral Studies AZ1000, Baku city, 158
Vidadi street Republic of Azerbaijan. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5909-8263
**** Head Member of the Bar Association of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the law oce№20 AZ1069 Republic
of Azerbaijan, Baku city, 158, Khan Shushinski Street. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6966-
5495

Para continuar leyendo

Solicita tu prueba

VLEX utiliza cookies de inicio de sesión para aportarte una mejor experiencia de navegación. Si haces click en 'Aceptar' o continúas navegando por esta web consideramos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. ACEPTAR