Características de la comprensión de las relaciones sociales en el derecho moderno: regulación teórica, administrativa, civil jurídica
| Autor | Yuliia Zaporozhchenko, Kostiantyn Kolesnykov, Halyna Tatarenko, Andrii Fomin, Oksana Zuieva |
| Cargo | Yuliia Zaporozhchenko, University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine. Doctor of Historical Sciences, Department of History and Theory of State and Law, University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine. / Kostiantyn Kolesnykov, University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine. Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the ... |
| Páginas | 347-355 |
Recibido el 22/11/22 Aceptado el 12/01/23
ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas
La re vis taCues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca ción aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to
de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co “Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che” (IEPDP) de la Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas de la Uni ver si dad del Zu lia.
En tre sus ob je ti vos fi gu ran: con tri buir con el pro gre so cien tí fi co de las Cien cias
Hu ma nas y So cia les, a tra vés de la di vul ga ción de los re sul ta dos lo gra dos por sus in ves-
ti ga do res; es ti mu lar la in ves ti ga ción en es tas áreas del sa ber; y pro pi ciar la pre sen ta-
ción, dis cu sión y con fron ta ción de las ideas y avan ces cien tí fi cos con com pro mi so so cial.
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas apa re ce dos ve ces al año y pu bli ca tra ba jos ori gi na les con
avan ces o re sul ta dos de in ves ti ga ción en las áreas de Cien cia Po lí ti ca y De re cho Pú bli-
co, los cua les son so me ti dos a la con si de ra ción de ár bi tros ca li fi ca dos.
ESTA PU BLI CA CIÓN APA RE CE RE SE ÑA DA, EN TRE OTROS ÍN DI CES, EN
:
Re vicyhLUZ, In ter na tio nal Po li ti cal Scien ce Abs tracts, Re vis ta In ter ame ri ca na de
Bi blio gra fía, en el Cen tro La ti no ame ri ca no para el De sa rrol lo (CLAD), en Bi blio-
gra fía So cio Eco nó mi ca de Ve ne zue la de RE DIN SE, In ter na tio nal Bi blio graphy of
Po li ti cal Scien ce, Re vencyt, His pa nic Ame ri can Pe rio di cals In dex/HAPI), Ul ri ch’s
Pe rio di cals Di rec tory, EBS CO. Se en cuen tra acre di ta da al Re gis tro de Pu bli ca cio-
nes Cien tí fi cas y Tec no ló gi cas Ve ne zo la nas del FO NA CIT, La tin dex.
Di rec to ra
L
OIRALITH
M. C
HIRINOS
P
ORTILLO
Co mi té Edi tor
Eduviges Morales Villalobos
Fabiola Tavares Duarte
Ma ría Eu ge nia Soto H ernández
Nila Leal González
Carmen Pérez Baralt
Co mi té Ase sor
Pedro Bracho Grand
J. M. Del ga do Ocan do
José Ce rra da
Ri car do Com bel las
An gel Lom bar di
Die ter Nohlen
Al fre do Ra mos Ji mé nez
Go ran Ther born
Frie drich Welsch
Asis ten tes Ad mi nis tra ti vos
Joan López Urdaneta y Nil da Ma rín
Re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas.Av. Gua ji ra. Uni ver si dad del Zu lia. Nú cleo Hu ma nís ti co. Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas. Ins ti tu to de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co
“Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che”. Ma ra cai bo, Ve ne zue la. E- mail: cues tio nes po li ti cas@gmail.
com ~ loi chi ri nos por til lo@gmail.com. Te le fax: 58- 0261- 4127018.
Vol. 41, Nº 73 (2023), 347-355
IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ
Features of understanding social
relations in modern law: theoretical,
administrative, civil legal regulation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.19
Yuliia Zaporozhchenko *
Kostiantyn Kolesnykov **
Halyna Tatarenko ***
Andrii Fomin ****
Oksana Zuieva *****
Abstract
The purpose of the research was to redene the concept of social
relations from the point of view of its theoretical, administrative
and civil aspects of legal regulation, considering, for this purpose,
various scientic contributions. The main content is based on
the meaning of the concepts of “public relations” and “social
relations” as political and legal entities with dierent paradigmatic
essence. The methodological basis of the research was constituted by the
comparative-legal and systemic analysis, the formal-legal method, the
method of interpretation, hermeneutics and the methods of analysis and
synthesis. By way of conclusion the authors have established that the term
“public relations” characterizes relations between people, which provide
for the unconditional priority of the economy over other spheres of society
(political, ideological, cultural), material and symbolic spaces where there
is no place for a person with his values, rights and freedoms. At least, the
latter do not acquire due regulatory support.
Keywords: administrative public relations; legal regulation; civil
relations; legal theory; modern law.
* Doctor of Historical Sciences, Department of History and Theory of State and Law, University of
Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-0693
** Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History and Theory of State and
Law, University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-
2636-952X
*** PhD, Head of the Department of Constitutional Law – Law Faculty, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian
National University, Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6291-4455
**** Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of History and Archeology,
Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.
org/0000-0001-9565-3706
***** Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Public and Private Law,
University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-
1509
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba