Estándares de justicia justa y su relación con los estándares de prueba en procesos penales
| Autor | Serhii Kovalchuk/Liliia Korytko/Galyna Kret/Serhii Fomin/Volodymyr Hryniuk |
| Cargo | Doctor of Legal Science, Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University «Odessa Law Academy», 76000, 13 Maximovycha str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine/Doctor of Legal Science, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General Legal and Human Sciences of Ivano-... |
| Páginas | 957-971 |
ISSN 0798- 1406 ~ De pó si to le gal pp 198502ZU132
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas
La re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas, es una pu bli ca ción aus pi cia da por el Ins ti tu to
de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli co “Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che” (IEPDP) de la Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas de la Uni ver si dad del Zu lia.
En tre sus ob je ti vos fi gu ran: co n tri buir con el pro gre so cien tí fi co de las Cien cias
Hu ma nas y So cia les, a tra vés de la di vul ga ción de los re sul ta dos lo gra dos por sus in ves-
ti ga do res; es ti mu lar la in ves ti ga ción en es tas áreas del sa ber; y pro pi ciar l a pre sen ta-
ción, dis cu sión y con fron ta ción de las ideas y avan ces cien tí fi cos con com pro mi so so cial.
Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas apa re ce dos ve ce s al año y pu bli ca tra ba jos ori gi na les con
avan ces o re sul ta dos de in ves ti ga ción en las áreas de Cien cia Po lí ti ca y De re cho Pú bli-
co, los cua les son so me ti dos a la con si de ra ción de ár bi tros ca li fi ca dos.
ESTA PU BLI CA CIÓN APA RE CE RE SE ÑA DA, EN TRE OTROS ÍN DI CES, EN
:
Re vicyhLUZ, In te r na tio nal Po li ti cal Scien ce Abs tracts, Re vis ta In ter ame ri ca na de
Bi blio gra fía, en el Cen tro La ti no ame ri ca no para el De sa rrol lo (CLAD), en Bi blio-
gra fía So cio Ec o nó mi ca de Ve ne zue l a de RE DIN SE, In ter na tio nal Bi blio gra phy of
Po li ti cal Scien ce, Re venc yt, His pa nic Ame ri can Pe rio di cals In dex/HAPI), Ul ri ch’s
Pe rio di cals Di r ec tory, EBS CO. Se en cuen tra acre di ta da al Re gis tro de Pu bli ca cio-
nes Cien tí fi cas y Tec no ló gi cas Ve ne zo la nas del FO NA CIT, La tin dex.
Di rec to ra
L
OIRALITH
M. C
HIRINOS
P
ORTILLO
Co mi té Edi tor
Eduviges Morales Villalobos
Fabiola Tavares Duarte
Ma ría Eu ge nia Soto Hernández
Nila Leal González
Carmen Pérez Baralt
Co mi té Ase sor
Pedro Bracho Grand
J. M. Del ga do Ocan do
José Ce rra da
Ri car do Com bel las
An gel Lom bar di
Die ter Nohlen
Al fre do Ra mos Ji mé nez
Go ran Ther born
Frie drich Welsch
Asis ten tes Ad mi nis tra ti vos
Joan López Urdaneta y Nil da Ma rín
Re vis ta Cues tio nes Po lí ti cas. Av. Gua ji ra. U ni ver si dad del Zu lia. Nú cleo Hu ma nís ti co. Fa-
cul tad de Cien cias Ju rí di cas y Po lí ti cas. Ins ti tu t o de Es tu dios Po lí ti cos y De re cho Pú bli c o
“Dr. Hum ber to J. La Ro che”. Ma ra cai bo, Ve ne zue la. E- mail: cues tio nes po li ti cas@gmail.
com ~ loi chi ri nos por til lo@gmail.com. Te le fax: 58- 0261- 4127018.
Vol. 39, Nº 71 (2021), 957-971
IEPDP-Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas - LUZ
Recibido el 15/09/2021 Aceptado el 28/11/2021
Standards of fair justice and their
relationship to standards of proof in
criminal proceedings
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.58
Serhii Kovalchuk *
Liliia Korytko **
Galyna Kret ***
Serhii Fomin ****
Volodymyr Hryniuk *****
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to dene the concept, system and
content of fair justice standards and outline their relationship to
standards of evidence in criminal proceedings. The purpose of the
study is to reveal the content of the right to a fair trial, distinguish
fair justice standards and establish its relationship with standards
of evidence in criminal proceedings. The research methodology consists of
comparative law, structural system methods and formal legal methods.
The study found that testing standards are covered by justice standards,
expanding, specifying, and clarifying their content. The content of the
fair justice standards “examination of the case by an independent and
impartial tribunal established by law”, “adversarial procedure”, “equality of
the parties”, “frankness of the examination of evidence”, “presumption of
innocence” and reveals the “motivation of judicial decisions”. It is concluded
that each of these concepts is a heuristic contribution to test standards. As
a result of the study, the author’s denition of the concept of “fair justice
standards” is formulated and the concept is based on its relationship with
the standards of evidence in criminal proceedings.
* Doctor of Legal Science, Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of
Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University «Odessa Law Academy», 76000, 13 Maximovycha
str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-099X
** Doctor of Legal Science, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General Legal and Human
Sciences of Ivano-Frankivsk Law Institute, National University «Odessa Law Academy», 76000, 13
Maximovycha str., Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3812-205X
*** Doctor of Legal Science, Associate Professor, Judge of Grand Chamber, Supreme Court, 01043, 4
Pylypa Orlyka str., Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4906-4799
**** Candidate of Legal Science, Associate Professor, Judge of Criminal Cassation Court, Supreme Court,
01043, 4 Pylypa Orlyka str., Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-5633
***** Doctor of Legal Science, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal
Procedure and Criminalistics, Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, 01033, 60 Volodymyrska
str., Kyiv, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6340-0584
Para continuar leyendo
Solicita tu prueba